The Eustace Diamonds by Anthony Trollope
published as a serial 1871-72
I very much like a Becky Sharp character, a young
woman who is definitely on the make without a care for morals and rules, and
there has been much discussion
on the blog. The
original Becky came to the world via William Thackeray’s Vanity Fair in
1847-48, though I’d love to hear claims for earlier versions. Daniel Defoe’s
Moll Flanders perhaps? – though Moll seemed much more someone who was subject
to outside forces: a really great Becky makes her own way in life.
Anthony Trollope’s Lizzie Eustace – 20+
years after Vanity Fair – is a wonderful character: completely out for
herself, absolutely no qualms or shame or nonsense about truth or honour. There
is something so very whole-hearted about her lack of principles.
In a small number of pages, Lizzie is married off to Lord
Eustace, and widowed very soon after. She has a son – the heir to the title –
and is comfortably off. But then there is the question of the Eustace diamonds
– a very beautiful and valuable necklace. Her husband gave them to her – but
did they remain part of the family property technically and legally, or are
they her own to do as she wants with?
the circle of stones with a Maltese cross appended to it…
Out of this simple question Trollope creates a fascinating winding
plot in The Eustace Diamonds, full of interest and jeopardy, more than 800 pages of it. The reader goes
back and forth on the legal question, though is never in any doubt that Lizzie
will hold onto them at all costs, telling any lie necessary, and embroiling her
friends in all kinds of difficult situations. There is also a significant crime
plot – I don’t want to say too much because I very much enjoyed not knowing
where the story was going.
There are – of course – other characters. Lizzie is a very
young and beautiful widow, so would like to re-marry. She wants to go to her
Scottish castle, and ‘she was accompanied by her eldest cousin, Ellinor
Greystock, a lady who was just ten years her senior. There could hardly be a
better woman than Ellinor Greystock,—or a more good-humoured, kindly being… the
two ladies went to Scotland together.’ This weirdly reminded me of Agatha
Christie’s Peril
at End House, where a cousin is living with the rich and
beautiful Nick Buckley. In this case, I think we see the effects of the book’s
being a serial: Ellinor is a very promising character, surely this Scottish
trip is important – but Ellinor hardly ever appears again, and this stay in the
castle (there will be others later) has no purpose except filling in time so Lizzie
can come back on the marriage market, two years after being widowed. (Widows,
black clothes and waiting were all
much-discussed on the blog last year).
Lizzie is an attractive prospect for some, and her dead
husband’s family would quite like her off their hands. She is very fond of her
cousin Frank, a penniless lawyer, choosing to ignore the fact that he is the
beloved of Lucy (a much better-behaved young lady). There is a dubious
pastor/preacher, a bad-tempered aunt, some very rackety friends, a young woman
who is being pushed into marriage with an awful man - she’s not much better
herself, but it is clear they should not be together.
All in all a splendid plot, and you never know what is
round the next corner: though the chapter titles are sometimes annoying:
eg ‘Lizzie triumphs’ as the title of a chapter where she is about to have an
important and worrying meeting (I am not spoilering the overall plot here).
I have mentioned
before that the big problem with Becky Sharp characters is – how
are they going to end up? Usually we have become very fond of them (as has the
author), we have invested in them, so they can’t get their just deserts, but
nor – on the whole – can they be allowed to win everything. Not in Victorian
times, and not really now, surprisingly.
It's a fine line – and Trollope does well here, especially
as I am guessing that we are going to hear more of Lizzie in the subsequent
Palliser novels. (Don't tell me, please, I want to be surprised.)
And of course a question arises, as it has in other Trollope novels covered here, about the status of women, and the economics of their lives. Last year one of the best discussions in the comments (and there have been some bangers) came below a throwaway post on The Small House at Allington, about a woman knowing she looked good in a riding-habit. So I’m going to do another post on this book to pursue that, coming soon... The second post is here.
Lizzie Eustace is tremendous fun – never a dull moment. I
always like a good medical diagnosis. Here she wants to avoid being a witness
in court:
Pulmonary debilitation was the
complaint from which she was suffering, which, with depressed vitality in all
the organs, and undue languor in all the bodily functions, would be enough to
bring her to a speedy end if she so much as thought of making a journey up to
London.
And she makes sure she looks nice in bed:
A fresh nightcap, and a clean
pocket-handkerchief with a bit of lace round it, and, perhaps, some pretty
covering to her shoulders if she were to be required to sit up in bed.
We can only recommend a Clothes in Books bedjacket.
There is a maid with the excellent name of Patience
Crabstick.
Unfortunately there are some very anti-Semitic stereotypes
regarding jewellers, money-lenders and indeed
criminals - very much of their time, but reading nastily to modern eyes.
There is a lot about the finances of having people to stay
in your Scottish castle, and the expenses and calculations of horses and
carriages, which I found very interesting, as usually not considered in
Victorian novels.
Lord Fawn – the dull dud featured in Phineas
Finn on the blog recently – has this enjoyable sideswipe aimed
at him: ‘Of course Lord Fawn, like a great child, would at once go and tell his
mother what that wicked governess had said to him.’
The final tribute: there’s a point where Lizzie is very
convincingly threatening to throw the diamonds into the sea to get rid of them,
and I found myself shouting “NOOO!!!” out loud.
Truly, an excellent book.
It is huge fun! I love that diagnosis: 'depressed vitality in all the organs and undue langour in all the bodily functions.' Who doesn't suffer from that sometimes? Chrissie
ReplyDeleteFun is absolutely the word. It honestly makes you think that Trollope has to have been a lovely man to write that. 'Undue langour' is a wonderful phrase. I can feel it coming on.
DeleteOh, this does sound like fun, Moira. And I always did like Becky Sharp's way of looking out for herself. Especially in those times, a woman had to do that, and it's interesting to see how that plays out in novels from (and about) the times.
ReplyDeleteYes, Margot, I think the position of women, and the way we think of that now, really has changed how we think about some Victorian novels, and their female characters.
DeleteWonderful post on one of my favourite Trollopes. I’ve always thought Lizzie Eustace stands comparison with Becky Sharp. If we are talking Bad Girls, what about Lady Audley, or Scarlet O’Hara? And what about Dulcie in Noel Strearfeild’s It Pays To Be Good?
ReplyDeleteThank you! And yes, great suggestions. I always felt Noel S must have had a very dislikeable Dulcie in her own life, because there is Dulcie in Wintle's Wonders also...
DeleteI haven't read the book yet, but if it is anything like the movie with Kate Beckinsale, Austen's Lady Susan is quite a character.
ReplyDeleteOh yes, Lady Susan is very much an earlier Becky Sharp, good catch. It's a pity Jane Austen moved on to 'nicer' heroines - though Mary Crawford in Mansfield Park is another woman on the make.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteI forgot the infamous Mary Crawford! I know that lots of readers think she should be the heroine instead of Fanny Price, in fact I once got into almost-a-fight online with some guy who called Mary something like "Heaven's cheerleader." She's certainly a more interesting character than Fanny and I wonder if Austen regretted doing such a good job with Mary, to the detriment of her heroine!
DeleteMansfield Park is the book where one would most like to know what JA was thinking.
DeleteAs someone has pointed out, Mary Crawford very much resembles the Jane Austen of the letters - gossipy, unrespectful, tasteless, bitchy. Yet the book - not just Fanny - plainly disapproves. Was the author trying to show how the world should be, rather than is?
"Beautiful, but tolerably virtuous", rather than wicked, we are told, is Lucy Glitters “of the Astley’s Royal Amphitheatre", former circus rider, who marries the hero of Mr. Sponge's Sporting Tour. Mr Sponge decamps when the money runs out, and Lucy takes up with Facey Romford and helps him sell horses and run a hunt. It's said Lucy was based on "the famous horse-breaker" Skittles. She and other leading courtesans displayed themselves in side-saddle on Rotten Row and regularly went hunting at fashionable hunts.
DeleteIt's an interesting aspect of hunting in Victorian novels. People can present themselves with no known background and disrupt the whole social assumptions of society. At the same time, they can display qualities which would never be known in the drawing room.
Lady Clarinda Bossnowl, in Peacock's Crotchett Castle, who spurns her rich lover, Captain Fitzchrome, and intends to marry a rich jew (typically victorian, I'm afraid), sums up the Victorian marriage market with Brechtian honesty until she repents and marries Fitzchrome.
Whoops! Lady Clarinda Bossnowl, in Peacock's Crotchett Castle, spurns her poor
Delete(poor as in only having a small private income) lover, Captain Fitzchrome, of course.
Of course! 😊😊😊
DeleteI have read Crotchet Castle (I can only save face by putting the right number of ts in it) but so long ago that I could not tell you what happens, or to whom.
I know you have told me before to read Mr Sponge's Sporting Tour, but I haven't, so have just downloaded a Kindle edition.
I don't think of hunting as the great social equalizer, so that is a very interesting perception which I will take on board!
I hope I don't tell people to read books! I enjoyed Surtees, but it's hard to get into - some aspects are Victorian in a bad way, rather than a good way, but I think he's worthwhile. Nimrod's Memoirs of the Life of the Late John Mytton gives another portrait from the rackety side of hunting and Victorian sport in general.
DeleteAntisemitism is a curious trope of Victorian literature: neither Trollope nor Peacock were personally antisemitic by the look of things, and Shirley Letwin says "The most perfect gentleman in Trollope's novels is Madame Max Goesler". It went on later: Christopher Ricks's T.S. Eliot and prejudice has a fascinating discussion. Antisemitism in books seems to have been an almost-abstract game until the rise of Hitler made people think about it.
Let's say you suggest books, and always welcome.
DeleteIt is hard to comprehend what that particular strain of anti-semitism was about, because it was markedly different from the usual criticisms of eg johnnie Frenchman, there was a level of disdain which is hard to understand or forgive.
In a book I read recently there is a reference to the kind of Jew who is allright because he hasn't anglicized his name - it's the others you have to watch. It is dismaying in writers who were presumably charming delightful people, and who intended their characters to be amusing and pleasing.
Which is the book where " there is a reference to the kind of Jew who is allright because he hasn't anglicized his name"? I think it was Disraeli who has a character say he anglicised his name for the benefit of the barbarous and ignorant English. In Coningsby(?) Disraeli plays with the stereotype: a jew is raising a loan for a government and goes to various countries to raise money, and in every one the relevant minister is a jew. Disraeli names them, and in reality, none of them were.
DeleteIt's a Golden Age detective story from the 1930s, by a forgotten writer, and I'm about to contribute to a podcast about it, so will hold my fire till then. But it took a moment or two to be sure where I remembered it from! - all too depressingly it could have been in a number of my recently-read books. Possibly not excluding Trollope.
DeleteA favorite! It's been a while...but isn't Lizzie addicted to reading Byron? Even imagining one of her multiple suitors (mild spoiler: not Lord Fawn, oh definitely not the aptly named Lord Fawn) as her "Corsair?" It is never a good sign when Trollope's young ladies read Byron. I seem to remember an early scene in which Lizzie, surprised by a respectable visitor, hurriedly thrusts a volume of Byron behind the sofa cushions? Or maybe a French novel. Even worse. -- Your fan, Trollopian
ReplyDeleteOh, and so much happens in the very first rollicking chapter. Lizzie loses her (unmissed) father, moves in with her grim but titled aunt, hocks her jewels, gets them out of hock by hinting at her marriage to the "vicious" (as in "vice") Florian Eustace, does indeed snag Lord Eustace, presents him with a pile of bills, sends him to an expected yet surely disillusioned grave. Those Victorians writing for serial publication knew how to get a plot going. All in less than 12 months and eight pages. "[And] she bore beneath her bosom the fruits of her husband's love." Luckily the child is a boy so we get another 79 chapters that never, ever sag. -- Trollopian
DeleteAbsolutely, such a great opening - correctly suggesting that it is going to continue at this pace!
DeleteYes, she likes her Byron, and also her Shelley (though Trollope implies that she doesn't really understand Shelley). She misses church alternate weeks because of a 'headache' which means she has to stay in bed with a French novel - as you say, we know that implies hot stuff.
And yes, she takes quite the fancy to Lord George de Bruce Carruthers, who is a nuanced character, and hopes he might be her Corsair. He comes from an unclear background and has unexpectedly inherited a title. I liked him because it wasn't clear quite what you were supposed to make of him... he certainly had Lizzie's number by the end....
I have to admit that at time Lizzie made me think of Trump, she held onto those diamonds like Trump holds onto power, no matter what whoppers must be told.
ReplyDeleteYes, and it's interesting that she doesn't really care about them in the end, they are just a nuisance, and no use to her, but she will NOT give them up, on principle - the nearest she gets to having principles.
DeleteI wondered - is she one of those people who convince themselves of the truth of her lies, or is she perfectly aware and just doesn't feel obliged to tell the truth?
I think she knew the truth but also knew that the truth could harm her interests. So she presented "alternate facts"!
ReplyDelete... and had no qualms!
DeleteI think Austen provides a number of proto-Becky Sharpes, but mainly in smaller roles. The most successful is Lucy Steele - holds onto one potential husband for years, in spite of knowing he wants out of the engagement, warns off the opposition while securing her silence, secures a better match and dumps the first one, and then works on her mother-in-law to get the most benefits. Isabella Thorpe tries to do the same thing but with less success because she throws over her fiance when she thinks there is a better chance ... without actually securing the better option first.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I would disagree that Mary Crawford is 'on the make'. Given her fortune, she doesn't need to be ... and more importantly, she goes for the man she falls in love with, even though he's the younger son (provoking though she finds this). I actually think her story is quite sad - borderline tragic - and intentionally so. A fundamentally nice person, but who suffered from poor education, and so where she should be guided by principles there is ... nothing but her own good nature, which isn't always the best guide. She is attracted by the principled characters, but doesn't understand why, and in the end loses what she wants most. She could have been Elizabeth Bennet, as she has the wit and charm, but because of the poor education she has this big lack of principle. (I could go on and on about this, as I think it's a key theme of the book. But I won't.)
Oh that is so interesting, thank you for these great perceptions, which I will be thinking about.
DeleteI am always fascinated by the character of Mary, and do like her, but just long to know austen's thoughts on her. Perhaps if she and Fanny could have met in the middle...
I'm just thinking about Gaskell's Wives and Daughters - Molly's stepsister Cynthia has very different principles and scruples, they are a gentler version of Mary and Fanny. But they are helpful to each other, they have a very nice relationship.